<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2010 Year In Reviews &#8211; INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://acmazzaro.com/2010/01/18/2010-year-in-reviews-inglourious-basterds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://acmazzaro.com/2010/01/18/2010-year-in-reviews-inglourious-basterds/</link>
	<description>A nice place to visit, but....</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 03:45:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dug sockets</title>
		<link>http://acmazzaro.com/2010/01/18/2010-year-in-reviews-inglourious-basterds/comment-page-1/#comment-1568</link>
		<dc:creator>dug sockets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acmazzaro.com/?p=295#comment-1568</guid>
		<description>mister fox rox!  and up was medicore. are you plannig to see every single movie that comes out in the year? cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mister fox rox!  and up was medicore. are you plannig to see every single movie that comes out in the year? cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://acmazzaro.com/2010/01/18/2010-year-in-reviews-inglourious-basterds/comment-page-1/#comment-1567</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acmazzaro.com/?p=295#comment-1567</guid>
		<description>ok.  maybe not top 5, but top 7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok.  maybe not top 5, but top 7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonio</title>
		<link>http://acmazzaro.com/2010/01/18/2010-year-in-reviews-inglourious-basterds/comment-page-1/#comment-1566</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 07:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acmazzaro.com/?p=295#comment-1566</guid>
		<description>Just off the top of my head, films I&#039;d score higher from 2009:

Trek
District 9
Public Enemies
Avatar
The Hurt Locker
The Hangover
Precious
Funny People

and that&#039;s not even including:

Up
Up in the Air
Where the Wild Things Are
Terminator Salvation
(500) Days of Summer
The Fantastic Mr. Fox

which I suspect might be &quot;better&quot;, I just haven&#039;t seen them...

The Maximus quote is a good call. Ask yourself if it would fit in &quot;Gladiator&quot; if there was a Stiglitz-style intro for that returning retired fighter Maximus takes on and decides to spare (MAXIMUS THE MERCIFUL!). It wouldn&#039;t, because it&#039;s not that kind of movie. This one isn&#039;t, but it is, but then what is it? It&#039;s all over the map stylistically, because Tarantino just can&#039;t help himself from doing something entertaining and cool, even at the expense of consistency. As a viewer, that frustrates me. At least in &quot;Kill Bill&quot; it was obvious. Here it&#039;s only kind of obvious, which to me makes it worse.

I actually think Tarantino takes himself quite seriously, and is not without pretension. And I found this film to be entertaining. But it was like a 40&#039;s Bogart-style drama in parts, mixed with Zack Snyder&#039;s &quot;Watchmen&quot;. It spent time being so many different things, I was never completely satisfied with any one thing it was. It was a collection of great scenes, some of which were consistent, and some of which were fraught with trying too hard to be &quot;cool&quot; stylistically.

He&#039;s so anxious to borrow from so many styles and films he gets so overzealous, that, to me, it&#039;s annoying. Again, to me. I WAS entertained. I was just also frustrated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just off the top of my head, films I&#8217;d score higher from 2009:</p>
<p>Trek<br />
District 9<br />
Public Enemies<br />
Avatar<br />
The Hurt Locker<br />
The Hangover<br />
Precious<br />
Funny People</p>
<p>and that&#8217;s not even including:</p>
<p>Up<br />
Up in the Air<br />
Where the Wild Things Are<br />
Terminator Salvation<br />
(500) Days of Summer<br />
The Fantastic Mr. Fox</p>
<p>which I suspect might be &#8220;better&#8221;, I just haven&#8217;t seen them&#8230;</p>
<p>The Maximus quote is a good call. Ask yourself if it would fit in &#8220;Gladiator&#8221; if there was a Stiglitz-style intro for that returning retired fighter Maximus takes on and decides to spare (MAXIMUS THE MERCIFUL!). It wouldn&#8217;t, because it&#8217;s not that kind of movie. This one isn&#8217;t, but it is, but then what is it? It&#8217;s all over the map stylistically, because Tarantino just can&#8217;t help himself from doing something entertaining and cool, even at the expense of consistency. As a viewer, that frustrates me. At least in &#8220;Kill Bill&#8221; it was obvious. Here it&#8217;s only kind of obvious, which to me makes it worse.</p>
<p>I actually think Tarantino takes himself quite seriously, and is not without pretension. And I found this film to be entertaining. But it was like a 40&#8217;s Bogart-style drama in parts, mixed with Zack Snyder&#8217;s &#8220;Watchmen&#8221;. It spent time being so many different things, I was never completely satisfied with any one thing it was. It was a collection of great scenes, some of which were consistent, and some of which were fraught with trying too hard to be &#8220;cool&#8221; stylistically.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s so anxious to borrow from so many styles and films he gets so overzealous, that, to me, it&#8217;s annoying. Again, to me. I WAS entertained. I was just also frustrated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://acmazzaro.com/2010/01/18/2010-year-in-reviews-inglourious-basterds/comment-page-1/#comment-1565</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 05:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acmazzaro.com/?p=295#comment-1565</guid>
		<description>Maximus famously asked: &quot;Are you not entertained?  Is this not why you are here?&quot;  

And I&#039;m not entirely sure that Tarantino has any pretensions of being a coffee-sipping auteur whose aesthetic touches are discussed by candlelight in Belgian cafes.  He makes what he wants to make because he likes it.  I&#039;ll get on board because it&#039;s a damn good time and 95X better than just about everything else out there.  Personally, I thought the Hugo Stiglitz intro was hilarious.  Inglorious Basterds is in the 2009 top 5, and belongs there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maximus famously asked: &#8220;Are you not entertained?  Is this not why you are here?&#8221;  </p>
<p>And I&#8217;m not entirely sure that Tarantino has any pretensions of being a coffee-sipping auteur whose aesthetic touches are discussed by candlelight in Belgian cafes.  He makes what he wants to make because he likes it.  I&#8217;ll get on board because it&#8217;s a damn good time and 95X better than just about everything else out there.  Personally, I thought the Hugo Stiglitz intro was hilarious.  Inglorious Basterds is in the 2009 top 5, and belongs there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
